since i've been on this digital-tear with the leica m9 ... well ... i think the lab has been a bit neglected as of late. in fact, i've just looked at some scans. there was a roll in the venerable mp, which has been giving me dirty brassed glances of late, which was shot in june and i recently finished it. apx 25.
it's so interesting to me ... this whole film vs. digi-thing. a visual effects supervisor friend told me about some symposium they had about the issue in the context of cinematography. they had every single one of the best cameras on some giant rig shooting the same thing. one of the biggest issues was that film captures sun/light flare much-much-much better than digi any day of the week. that was true of every camera tested ... even ones that guys like me will probably never get to operate due to cost.
it's all good. i'm happy shooting my 5dm2. so happy i didn't cut my motion-teeth on camcorders with results all looking like they're shot at f/8.
also ... i've scrapped all of the cavision stuff in my video bag besides the matte box ... for cinevate stuff. the build quality of cinevate's stuff is ridiculous. the "leaders-cough-cough" like zacuto and redrock ... well ... i'll just say nothing. don't believe the hype.
how about an homage to mr. rockwell? ;) should have had an nd grad filter on it, though, for a true homage and perhaps shot on velvia. ;)
ever since he called me out in his blog ... we've gotten to know each other ... and ...
he's not a bad guy. in fact, he's pretty damn nice. in fact, what i've really discovered is that he loves photography ... and ... i'm good with that. his photo of an oak tree's pretty nice, too.
don't think i'll be friends with the onlinephotographer-dude any time soon. at least ken makes photos and doesn't just craft words together to impress others who ... probably can't shoot either.
the world has not ended.
not even according to the mayans.
this was our guide at the tulum archaeological site. he knew everything.
then again, he was a guide, right? he should know everything about that site. besides the shard of glass that almost punctured my foot -- not just the flip-flop -- that place is rad.
yes, i said rad.
don't care if you don't like it.
nor do i care if you like my black-bordered photos on flickr.
i think j was iguana-papping. unsure. the film was from june.
my memory isn't that long.
those mayans sure knew where to build a nice resort. temple. resort. whatever.
same thing.
where that woman is standing is where a piece of really nasty glass almost went into my foot. thank you reef for making flip-flops which don't allow nasty pieces of strewn glass to puncture feet.
i don't like southern accents.
sorry.
they piss me off.
random. i know. but i'm in an airport and the assholes behind me are ... just annoying.
j found a friend.
damn i forgot how much i love film.
damn m9.
cancun had a very nice airport, actually.
where's waldo?
then skip forward like 3 months. ;)
had to expose those few last frames on something before i had to drive back from the icky west side to drop off at the lab.
homeboy is there every time i walk past. every time. i don't think he goes anywhere.
took b street-shooting. she asked if we could go. got an m8-two and the 1.4/24 mounted up for her and we took a metro to one of the best street-shooting hunting grounds on the planet. hollywood blvd on a sunday afternoon.
i looked at her stuff and she actually did quite well. most of the frames were perfectly focused. put the auto-iso feature on. set it on A. started teaching her about f/stops.
pretty cool day that was.
i even saw mj's angel.
you know it's gonna be a great day when you see mj's angel. right?
that's bella. we rescued her. she stayed with us two weeks. she ripped my heart out of my chest.
but ... her heart is all good according to our vet. :)
hadn't ever connected with a dog in the way i connected with her. sadly, hadn't even really connected with murph the way i connected with her.
i think murph misses his playmate.
cavs play the same way. they connect. it's a breed-thing. our friend says it's a royalty-thing, though.
dunno.
i do know i have more film scans to show. ;)
my friend joanna and io echo. the venerable mp and the new wonder ... the m9 shot right next to each other.

i don't think the m9 could have handled that last photo.
digital sensors and flares aren't all that good of friends.
guess that's why i shoot both.
my right thumb gets bored shooting digital. i could get one of those fake things people put on m8's but i don't think i will.
late-night gardening anyone?
someone needs a sensor-cleaning.
lunch.
fyi. it's apple season here. just so you know.
those fujis are/were amazing.

not as amazing as a cavalier face, though.
juxtaposition.
was wondering where the friggin' PETA sticker was.
i love shopping-photos.
and west coast sunsets.
and bamboo. and ... the fact my nocti doesn't back-focus any longer. :)
and the fact you can roll around l.a. and see productions everywhere. so happy producers have tired of the false promises from detroit, boston, new mexico, south carolina, etc., etc. bring production back to where "the professional crews" are. ;)
attn: jon gosselin ... please go away. attn: editors ... stop putting these douchebags on the covers of magazines ... they're not worthy.
one of the best restaurants in vegas, rm seafood. and i love having the nocti back.
the bitch is back. ;)
she's not a bitch, though. she's cool. and it's fun to make fun of the same people. ;)
clean bella. :)
keeping the eye on the prize as it were. he's like a shark. ;)
yes, light meters are still relevant.
even whilst lighting a spaniel with the new hensel lithium porty! :)
i think murph actually weighs less than the new lithium packs.
crazy-light.
even frank was in on the spaniel-tography. ;)
j ... wrangling...
the airplane is here!
hope you're all well! :)
cheers from vegas!
-c
ooohh so much yummy eye candy here.
Posted by: sarajaye | 15 October 2009 at 12:08 PM
mj's angel...that is freaking wild. Bella is so cute!
Posted by: Alex Ha | 15 October 2009 at 12:25 PM
Quite the bunch of shots! I love the shot of bella in the bath, and murph-shark and the table!
The shot in the.. walmart? with the old lady sitting on her walker is my favorite of the post
Posted by: Scott Alexander | 15 October 2009 at 03:52 PM
So I was at a convention of some sort a few weeks back and ran into this guy: http://johnhavard.com/misc/image-repository-a/a-real-photographer/view
He's clearly a REAL photographer. Interestingly, he shoots Nikon... at 15fps. Sounded like a machine gun.
Posted by: John Havard | 15 October 2009 at 04:35 PM
Chris, it would be interesting to see your take on the specific rangefinder issues raised by Jeff Ascough in this blog post.
http://jeffascough.typepad.com/jeff_ascough_blog/2009/10/rangefinder-photography.html
Posted by: John Ricard | 15 October 2009 at 06:03 PM
LOL! that mannequin dummy with the 'loose hand' is a classic!
we'll want to know is it Found or Staged!
:-)
cheers enjoyed another post as usual
more M9 please ... the M9 is nice but but but ...
Posted by: Fong Long | 15 October 2009 at 07:40 PM
@sarajaye: thanks, love. you're sweet.
Posted by: C Weeks | 15 October 2009 at 08:10 PM
@alex: i think i was on the phone as well when i saw that. odd that someone goes to hollywood blvd dressed as mj with wings and pose with you for a buck. odd.
Posted by: C Weeks | 15 October 2009 at 08:11 PM
@scott: it was target. there's a lot to shoot there but ... it's rather difficult. i liked that one as well but the murph-shark was my favourite! thanks, man.
Posted by: C Weeks | 15 October 2009 at 08:13 PM
@john: oh my. that's ... well ... i've never actually seen anyone wearing one of those. i have seen someone with one of these, though:
http://internationalpress.com/index.php?file=step1
hanging from their neck. my dog could apply for this.
and get it.
Posted by: C Weeks | 15 October 2009 at 08:16 PM
@john: scanned it on the iphone. i like his photography a lot. i think that most wedding work -- apart from that highly stylized stuff i see way too often -- is beautiful. if what he does works for him, totally, do it. clearly whatever he does works.
that said weddings to me are no different than any other event and i still find rangefinder coverage -- especially now with the m9 -- wholly and more relevant than ever. they have their limitations for sure but i can guarantee the diminutive profile of my m is way less noticeable than one of the dslrs.
not only but ... whereas film is a bit limiting in the whole wastefulness kinda way ... digi ... i can make more photographs as i do with dslrs -- i don't machine gun and anyone who's shot with me knows this. in fact ... i find that i move my body a bit when shooting rangefinder stuff and do my normal triple-tap. the changing angle do to me moving makes some photographs even stronger than when i originally saw them.
i don't know if there's a reason to talk about the initial m8. it was what it was and i enjoyed shooting it in certain contexts. the m9 is a totally different experience ... and it will be on one of my shoulders permanently.
let the rest of the world only see it through canon and nikon. ;)
Posted by: C Weeks | 15 October 2009 at 08:23 PM
@fong: wholly unstaged. 20th century props is liquidating and we've walked through it looking for some stuff. i'm sure someone else staged it as the workers there didn't appear to have much time for that.
but ... but ... but ... what?
Posted by: C Weeks | 15 October 2009 at 08:24 PM
but but but ... oh yeah
just expressing that same feeling you get at with 'damn m9'
:-)
Posted by: Fong Long | 16 October 2009 at 04:40 AM
"damn i forgot how much i love film.
damn m9."
i knew it !!!!
:D
Posted by: severin | 16 October 2009 at 08:44 AM
@ Chris. Hi Chris noticed in that photo of B's steetshooting that she was using a 1.4/24 with an 8.2. Don't you need an external viewfinder for any lens under 28mm? Or do you have a solution/technique?
Cheers
John
Posted by: John Lenneberg | 18 October 2009 at 02:13 AM
Really, just some amazing shots!! The nocti never ceases to amaze and I can't put my finger on exactly why, but I love the shot of the guy in the bar . . . lighting? bok, ah I mean dof? comp? don't know, but love it! The shot of J wranglin' Murphy is another great! Just great stuff, thanks and keep 'em coming!!
Posted by: Scott Jones | 18 October 2009 at 06:44 AM
B is turning into a beautiful lady and skilled photographer; J is just as beautiful as always, and great to see. Good to see you're still the same, too. Great shots; I can't comment like everyone else, because I don't know shit about cameras, f-stops, lenses, or anything... but I know what I like.
Made friends with Mr. Rockwell? That's cool. You're not as rough edged as you come across... well, not all the time, anyhow.
Love Bamboo, too... got a bamboo plant for my birthday (giant timber, not the "Lucky Bamboo" stuff). Planted in my back yard, and I hope it takes it over (it'll need help to do so, but I'm willing.)
Hope to pester you now and again, brother... still willing to carry gear for you, too. Probably pays better and less hassle than working for the Navy, I'd guess.
Posted by: Ashigaru | 18 October 2009 at 08:36 PM
Hey mate: sorry to ask you here, not sure if your bbq email still works, don't want to spam.
Know you've mentioned it before, this thing is not easy to search: what's your opinion of the Zeiss 50/1.4 (slr)? Love the Zeiss lenses but haven't heard much of this one. Not interested in the pixel peeping crap, just your take on it as a real user.
BTW: daughter saw murph and bella, damn, now I've got to fend off her "want one!"! "murph-shark" is just amazing! Recently lost our mini shnauzzer, she always wanted a cavalier...
:)
Posted by: Noons | 20 October 2009 at 03:41 AM
Nice shots Chris! Happy to see MJ’s angel also :)
The shots with the nocti are great!
Take care!
Richard
Posted by: Richard Polom | 20 October 2009 at 12:23 PM